Talk:Eve Borsook

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 July 2020 by reviewer MurielMary (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

CourtauldGill (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

worldcat a.o.

It is really unnerving to see all these links in the bibliographies, but, as it turns out there are not only all identical, they just lead to an bibliograpgical entry and ends there. One hopes for a digital copy of a book, and instead one gets frustrated several times over. The double and triple link epidemia has to end, there has to be another solution (merge them into one). It doesn't help anyone, it's just administrative bs. Sure, you want to do it right, but you can't overwrite the service of accessibility and clearness with redundant self-serving over-linking. MenkinAlRire 18:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]